Supreme Court Permits State Reach into Areas Previously Preempted by Federal Law

Apr 13, 2020

Dallas immigration lawyers

Dallas immigration lawyers – Rabinowitz & Rabinowitz, P.C.

Dallas, TX (Law Firm Newswire) April 13, 2020 – The U.S. Supreme Court decided in a March 3, 2020, decision that federal law does not preempt a state’s ability to prosecute individuals for providing false information when seeking employment. The court sided with Kansas in Kansas v. Garcia, 17-834, in deciding that the state could convict undocumented immigrants under its identity theft laws without interfering with federal immigration laws.

The case concerned Ramiro Garcia and two other undocumented individuals who used stolen Social Security numbers to get jobs. All three were convicted of identity theft under Kansas laws after being charged with making false statements in federal I-9 forms and state tax-withholding forms. The Kansas Supreme Court threw out all three convictions, holding that the state law intruded on the federal government’s exclusive authority to decide whether a person was eligible for employment in the United States under the 1986 Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA). The U.S. Supreme Court’s 5-4 ruling overturned the state decision.

“When faced with the choice of observing an overall federal design in the 1986 Immigration Reform and Control Act as it applies to criminalizing working without authorization and holding to federal preemption of the field, or permitting the states to occupy the field concurrently, the majority saw no conflict sharing the field with the states,” commented Stewart Rabinowitz of the Dallas and Frisco law firm of Rabinowitz & Rabinowitz, P.C. “And by holding that states may criminalize certain conduct and use information contained in a federal I-9 Employment Eligibility Verification document in state prosecutions, the Court has opened the door to employers and non-citizens facing actions enacted by state criminal statutes.”

A majority of the U.S. Supreme Court’s justices decided that the immigrants could be prosecuted for making false statements under Kansas law as it was not preempted by the IRCA. The majority sided with Kansas’s argument that although its prosecution relied on information submitted in federal I-9 forms, the same information had been provided in state work forms. As a result, the state prosecution could have proceeded without reliance on federal forms.

In a dissent written on behalf of the court’s four justices, Justice Stephen Breyer stated that the decision “opens a colossal loophole” as federal immigration law specifies that only the federal government has the power to prosecute individuals for federal work authorization violations. He noted that the IRCA preempts the state’s use of its tax-withholding forms for prosecution as an employee’s submission of a false Social Security number on an I-9 form is already a federal offense.

While federal law generally preempts state law when it comes to immigration, the Trump administration has supported Kansas in the case, maintaining that there was no clash between state and federal laws. The Supreme Court decision has broader implications for the prosecution of immigrants and employers at the state level. It may encourage states to assume a more active role in immigration enforcement by using identity laws and similar statutes to target undocumented workers for prosecution.

By Appointment Only
Three Galleria Tower
13155 Noel Road, Suite 900
Dallas, TX 75240

  • Rabinowitz & Rabinowitz, P.C.’s Announcement About COVID-19
    A message to our valued clients and business associates: At Rabinowitz & Rabinowitz, P.C., the health, safety and overall well being of our clients, business associates and the DFW community as a whole is of the utmost importance to us. Given the increasing concern surrounding the recent pandemic of COVID-19, otherwise known as the novel …
  • CRS Issues Report on Repurposing Funds to Build a Border Wall
    The Congressional Research Service (CRS) published a report that examines the federal statutes that the Trump Administration has cited to repurpose funds from existing appropriations to construct a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border. CRS also discussed multiple lawsuits that have been filed challenging the Administration’s actions. Congress appropriated $1.375 billion to the Department of Homeland …
  • USCIS to Limit Some Nonimmigrant Change or Extension of Status Applicants Based on New Public Charge Rule
    The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) on August 14, 2019, announced its final rule on inadmissibility on public charge grounds that imposes a new public benefit condition on individuals who apply for a change or extension of nonimmigrant status. The new rule was originally scheduled to take effect on October 15, 2019. But on October …