South Jersey Workers’ Compensation Attorneys Comment on Whether Employer Pays for Medical Marijuana Program
Mar 22, 2017
Pennsauken, NJ (Law Firm Newswire) March 22, 2017 – In New Jersey, a decision on the issue of whether medical marijuana can be ordered under workers’ compensation was rendered on December 15, 2016.
As reported by the National Workers Compensation Defense Network (NWCDN), plaintiff Andrew Watson was employed by 84 Lumber and suffered an injury on November 8, 2008. He was awarded one-third of partial total in 2012 allocated in the following way: 50 percent for the hand and 12.5 percent for complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS).
According to the terms of the settlement, 84 Lumber must approve continuous pain management treatment with Dr. Peter Corda, with whom Watson had consulted about taking part in New Jersey’s medical marijuana program (MMP) in 2013. In 2013, Dr. Corda referred Watson to his partner, Dr. Jeffrey Drew Polcer, who was qualified to perform medical marijuana assessments. Watson visited Dr. Polcer, and presented complaints of burning pain and swelling in his left hand accompanied by heightened sensitivity to touch. He said his medications failed to alleviate the pain. Watson admitted to Dr. Polcer that he had tried marijuana, which reduced the pain considerably.
Dr. Polcer determined that the plaintiff was afflicted with neuropathic and complex regional pain syndrome of the left hand and advised that Watson use medicinal marijuana. In addition, he stated that if the medicinal marijuana proves beneficial, plaintiff should reduce his use of other medication.
Noted South Jersey workers’ compensation attorneys, who are not involved with the case, Petrillo & Goldberg stated, “Since the treatment was effective, the only reasonable deduction was that the defendant should be required to pay for such treatment.”
After partaking in medical marijuana treatment, Watson presented the invoices and evidence of cash payments for the procedure to his employer’s insurance carrier, he was refused reimbursement. He filed an Emergent Motion to Enforce the provisions of the Approving Settlement from 2012. The defendant argued that Dr. Polcer was not an authorized doctor, and withdrew authorization of Dr. Corda, who was requested to conduct an IME of plaintiff. The Judge of Compensation ordered that authorization be reinstated for Dr. Corda, and a trial proceeded on the principal issue of medical marijuana as an effective treatment.
The judge ruled that there was medical justification for plaintiff’s use of medicinal marijuana, and therefore, ordered that the defendant pay for the expenses of the medical marijuana program and the plaintiff’s prescriptions.
Learn more at http://www.petrilloandgoldberg.com/
Petrillo & Goldberg Law
6951 North Park Drive
Pennsauken, NJ 08109
19 South 21st Street
Philadelphia, PA 19103
70 South Broad Street
Woodbury, NJ 08096
- Timely filing of occupational disease claim
Usually, if you suffer an injury at work, you must file an occupational disease claim within two years of the date you discovered the disability and its relevance to your job. Otherwise, you will be barred from bringing such a claim. While an accident has a certain date, it may be difficult to ascertain the […]
- Filing a New Jersey workers’ compensation claim based on wear and tear
While many injuries occur in the workplace suddenly as part of a traumatic accident, others take place more gradually over a period of time. Examples of traumatic incidents at work include falling off a ladder, cutting part of a hand while using a saw or a sudden increase in bodily pain caused by lifting a […]
- Paid breaks cannot offset compensation owed to employees
A district court decided that some of DuPont were not compensated for overtime. The employer contended that it should not be responsible for back pay because the workers had previously received all the compensation, to which they had a right. The employer further argued that since it provided them with paid meal breaks, although it […]
- Possible workers’ compensation for injuries suffered by at-fault employees
Although the New Jersey courts have issued a ruling that horseplay is considered normal behavior in the workplace, there is a distinction between “horseplay” and “negligence.” The individual who is found to be provoking or engaging in an incident, may be found negligent and at fault, according to N.J. Stat. Ann. §34:15-7.1, and as a […]
- Push for workers’ compensation for New Jersey corrections officers injured on the job
In light of recent attacks on New Jersey corrections officers, an effort has been under way to enact a law that would create a compensation program for workers who are injured during the course of their employment. On Saturday, September 10, an officer who was engaged in routine duty at a state correctional facility, suffered […]