U.S. Supreme Court Makes It Easier to File Constructive Discharge Actions — Chicago Employment Attorney Timothy Coffey
Jul 25, 2016
Chicago, IL (Law Firm Newswire) July 25, 2016 – In what many consider an important decision, the Supreme Court has now made it easier for federal workers to file discrimination lawsuits if they quit their jobs due to intolerable work conditions.
In the legal niche of employment law, constructive discharge, also called constructive dismissal or constructive termination, happens when an employee resigns from a position due to a hostile workplace environment created by the employer.
“The resignation is not voluntary and therefore it is, in effect, a termination,” explained respected Chicago employment lawyer, Timothy Coffey. The U.S. Supreme Court just recently ruled in a 7-1 decision that employees who do bring such claims have 45 days from the time they resign to launch a lawsuit. The Justice Department suggested time should begin running when the alleged workplace harassment/abuse occurs.
Consider the case of Marvin Green (Green v. Brennan), an African American, who alleged he was forced to quit his job due to racial discrimination. Green, then a postmaster from Englewood, Colorado, alleged his application was turned down for a similar post in Boulder, Colorado. He asked the post office to look into whether racial discrimination might have affected that decision.
Shortly after filing a discrimination complaint, Green’s relationship with his supervisors went sour and he alleged they suspended him without pay in 2009, claiming that he intentionally delayed the mail. Feeling that he had nowhere to go, Green signed an agreement in 2009 stating he would leave his work position provided the postal service did not file criminal charges. He waited 60 days to tender his resignation and did not file a constructive termination lawsuit until March 2010.
This ruling is important due to the fact that it means workers now have more time to take legal action regarding discriminatory actions that happened months or years before they file. And, according to Justice Sonia Sotomayor, the ruling is practical as some workers may delay handing in their resignations for various reasons, including waiting until they can afford to leave.
“Federal workers will find this ruling important, as they are not allowed to file an employment discrimination lawsuit until they first file an administrative claim. The administrative claim must be filed within 45 days of the date of the alleged discriminatory matter,” said Coffey.
For those in a similar situation to Mr. Green, it is important to consult with competent legal counsel to find out what legal options are available.
Learn more at http://www.employmentlawcounsel.com/
THE COFFEY LAW OFFICE, P.C.
351 W. Hubbard Street, Suite 602
Chicago, IL 60654
- Leave Under the Americans with Disabilities Act Is Not a Free Pass to Not Work
Lawsuits can go either way in court, as this plaintiff discovered when she lost her case. “While there are many reasons to file a lawsuit under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), those reasons must be valid when tested by the courts. If they are not, the plaintiff may lose his case. This is what […]
- There is a Proper Way to Issue Severance for Reduction in Force Situations, Says Chicago Employment Lawyer
There is a right way and a wrong way to issue severances. Employers need to follow a strict protocol or run afoul of the law. “To avoid a charge of ageism, or age discrimination, there are rules a company needs to follow if their reorganization or consolidation process ends up affecting older workers. An older […]
- Chicago Employment Lawyer Asserts Americans with Disabilities Act Does Not Exempt Employees from Work
Employers need to set clear expectations for employees in order to avoid ADA lawsuits “While there are many reasons to file a lawsuit under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), those reasons must be valid when tested by the courts,” according to Timothy Coffey, a Chicago employment lawyer and principal attorney for The Coffey Law […]