October 2015 Visa Bulletin Update: Class Action Lawsuit Filed Against DOS
Nov 18, 2015
Dallas, TX (Law Firm Newswire) November 18, 2015 – A class action lawsuit has been filed against the U.S. Department of State, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, and numerous government officials over changes in green card eligibility requirements in the amended October’s Visa Bulletin.
The amended October Visa Bulletin released by the State Department moved the cutoff dates for certain Indian and Chinese immigrants backward, limiting the number of foreign nationals in those categories to submit green card applications. For Indian applicants, the dates were pushed back two years, and for Chinese immigrants, the dates were moved back 16 months. The result is that these immigrants in the EB-2 category will have to wait longer to file green card applications. Several other backlogged categories were also affected.
The lawsuit, with 14 named plaintiffs and the potential for class members numbering in the thousands, alleges that the changes to the Visa Bulletin violates the Administrative Procedure Act and the due process rights of the plaintiffs.
“In 2007, a similar event occurred where DOS rolled back visa numbers after publication of its Visa Bulletin,” said Stewart Rabinowitz, a Dallas immigration attorney. “The threat of suit resulted in DOS reinstating the previously issued Visa Bulletin cutoff dates. Plaintiffs expect a similar outcome from this litigation.”
In addition to the change in cutoff dates for Indian and Chinese immigrants, the date for professional or skilled Filipino applicants — that is, those in the EB-3 category — were pushed back five years. Some family-based visa applications from Mexican immigrants were also affected.
The lawsuit, Chintan Mehta, et al. v. U.S. Department of State, et al., was filed in U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington, Seattle. According to the complaint, the plaintiffs are highly skilled workers, including a research engineer from China and IT professionals from India, who spent significant sums of money preparing to submit green card applications in reliance upon policy statements issued by the State Department.
The plaintiffs sought a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) and later a permanent injunction, blocking the amended October 2015 Visa Bulletin for taking effect. As of this writing, the court has denied the TRO and the case is proceeding.
Rabinowitz & Rabinowitz, P.C.
2591 Dallas Parkway, Suite 300
Frisco, TX 75034
By Appointment Only
Three Galleria Tower
13155 Noel Road, Suite 900
Dallas, TX 75240
- Congress permits additional H-1B and L-1 Fees to sunset
An additional fee that employers were required to pay for certain H-1B and L-1 visa petitions is no longer required as of Oct. 1, 2015, as Congress allowed the provision requiring the fees to expire. Public Law 111-230 was signed into law by President Barack Obama on Aug. 13, 2010. The law directed up to …
- USCIS Notice Benefits Nepalese F-1 Students With Severe Economic Need
A USCIS Notice advises that certain regulations have been suspended for Nepalese F-1 students in the United States who have experienced severe economic need arising out of the devastating earthquake which stuck Nepal on April 25, 2015. Eligible Nepalese F-1 students can engage in employment authorization and register for a reduced course load per semester. …
- Nevada Cab Companies Agree to Pay $445,000 to Settle DOJ Discrimination Claim
On October 20, 2015, three Nevada cab companies settled discrimination charges brought by the Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Division, Office of Special Counsel for Immigration-Related Unfair Employment Practices. The charges alleged that the companies, which operated together under the name Yellow Checker Star Transportation Company, discriminated against foreign nationals with U.S. work authorization because …