St. Peters, MO, (Law Firm Newswire) February 20, 2015 — A Missouri Court of Appeals has affirmed the decision of a lower court to award workers’ compensation benefits to Dorothy Smith, a widow who lost her husband to hepatitis C.
Smith’s husband, Stephen Smith, worked in a medical laboratory for more than 30 years, beginning in 1969. There, he could have been exposed to the disease before protective equipment and procedures became common in the 1990s.
“In this case, the employer tried to argue that Ms. Smith should not get benefits because she could not definitively prove that the workplace was the source of her husband’s infection,” remarked Charlie James, a Missouri workers’ compensation attorney not involved with the case. “But the court ruled that Ms. Smith did not have to provide absolute proof. Ms. Smith only needed to show that it was probable that her husband’s workplace was the source of the infection.”
Before the regular use of protective safety measures, Stephen Smith and his colleagues worked regularly under conditions in which particles of blood could be splashed into the eyes and nose, and in which laboratory technicians frequently experienced accidental needle sticks.
For many years, Smith also tested blood using a technique that required him to use his mouth to suck blood into a pipette. While blood was not supposed to enter the mouth during this procedure, it was significantly likely that blood particles could do so.
Smith’s employer, Capital Region Medical Center, showed that he had been the recipient of a blood transfusion in 1970. The center argued that he could have been infected with hepatitis C during the transfusion.
But the Missouri Labor and Industrial Relations Commission agreed with the expert medical witness for Dorothy Smith, who testified that it was more than 90 percent likely that her husband contracted hepatitis C as a result of his work. Still, initially, Ms. Smith was not awarded benefits because the Commission held that she could not prove that the infection happened at work.
“The appeals court clarified that to receive benefits, a claimant need only prove the probability that working conditions caused an injury,” commented James. “It is important for workers to know that they may be able to receive workers’ compensation benefits for a work injury even if they cannot fully prove exactly how the injury happened.”
The case is in question is Stephen Smith, Dorothy Smith v. Capital Region Medical Center, docket number WD77043, filed in the Missouri Court of Appeals for the Western District.
Learn more at http://www.jameslawgroup.net/.
James Law Group, LLC
14 Richmond Center Court
St. Peters, MO 63376
Toll Free: 800.229.7112
- Missouri bans deadly highway guardrail
The Missouri Department of Transportation has banned a type of highway guardrail implicated in the deaths of at least 14 motorists, including one Missouri man. Missouri resident Brad Abeln was killed in January after another driver swerved and pushed him into the guardrail. According to whistleblowers, the faulty guardrail contains a steel bar that should […]
- This Thanksgiving, stay safe on Black Wednesday
Most Americans know about Black Friday — the day after Thanksgiving, when shoppers hit the malls and online stores to pick up huge savings on their Christmas shopping. Fewer Americans are aware of Black Wednesday — the day before Thanksgiving. The term originated in the hospitality industry in reference to the packed bars that characterize […]
- More deaths and injuries linked to GM ignition switch defect
The independent administrator of the General Motors (GM) compensation fund has found more deaths and injuries caused by the faulty ignition switches than GM originally found on its own. The new count includes at least six more deaths and four more injuries that GM has not acknowledged. And the independent administrator, Kenneth Feinberg, says that […]
- Three essential steps for claiming workers’ compensation benefits
Obtaining workers’ compensation benefits can seem like an intimidating process, especially if your employer shows no interest in helping you with it. The Missouri Division of Workers’ Compensation recommends that you consult a lawyer if you feel confused or unsure about the process. While following a successful claim to completion can take some work, here […]
- Despite new bill, Missouri marijuana laws still strict
This summer, Missouri Governor Jay Nixon signed a bill that legalized some medical uses of cannabidiol (CBD) and some growing of marijuana in order to produce that oil. However, the new law still leaves most medical marijuana use and all recreational use prohibited in the state. CBD is an oil that can be extracted […]