Lakeland, FL (Law Firm Newswire) December 10, 2014 — Even if someone is arrested but not charged with or is ultimately acquitted of a crime, the accused’s DNA remains on file.
In 28 states, no warrant is required to take DNA samples from individuals arrested for certain serious crimes or for some misdemeanors. The law has been challenged by civil rights groups who claim it violates the Fourth Amendment, which addresses unreasonable search and seizure. As such, they allege that the law is unconstitutional.
In 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court handed down a ruling stating that the police may, as a matter of routine, take DNA samples from individuals they have arrested for serious crimes for which they have not been convicted. According to the Supreme Court, cheek swabbing for DNA is similar in nature to taking mug shots and fingerprinting. As booking procedure, DNA collection is reasonable.
“There is no doubt that if someone is convicted of a serious crime, their DNA information is kept in federal and state crime databases. It is often used to search for possible associations with other crimes. However, many people are not aware that if they are arrested and released, or arrested, charged and acquitted, their DNA may still be collected and entered in those databases,” explained Thomas C. Grajek, a Lakeland criminal defense attorney.
In light of the Supreme Court’s ruling, it is likely that the remaining 22 states may adopt similar laws. If that happens, the FBI CODIS database, with 11 million samples currently on file, is bound to grow substantially.
The database is not used solely to prove guilt. It is also used to rule out an individuals’ presence at a crime scene and to reverse wrongful convictions. Incriminating statements, improper forensic science, eyewitness misidentification and unreliable informant information and testimony have resulted in numerous wrongful convictions over the years. DNA can clear any questions up right away.
Alonzo King’s case stands behind the landmark decision. King was arrested in 2009 for brandishing a gun at a crowd. When arrested, police collected a DNA sample and sent it to the FBI. It was discovered that King’s DNA matched an unsolved rape six years previously.
King was convicted of the rape. But the Maryland Court of Appeals, stating that there were no particular suspicions of this individual and no warrant that could justify taking a cheek swab, tossed the conviction out. On appeal, the U.S. Supreme Court restored the conviction.
“If you are arrested for a crime, reach out and contact an experienced criminal defense attorney. You will need one to navigate the system,” said Grajek.
Learn more at http://www.flcrimedefense.com/
Thomas C. Grajek
206 Easton Drive, Suite 102
Lakeland, FL 33803
- Arrest made in Polk County "SWAT"ting incident involving "anonymous" calls to police to lure SWAT team to high school.
A Canadian juvenile was arrested in the recent Polk County “swatting” case. “SWATting” is when an individual attempts to lure the SWAT time to respond to a location for a fake threat of some type. Polk County deputies allege the teen anonymously placed hoax calls to law enforcement officials in an effort to lure SWAT teams to respond to Ft. Meade high school over the past four-months. Deputies say the investigation began in September, when an unidentified male called the sheriff’s office and Fort Meade High School and said he was going to “drive to Fort Meade High School in […]
- Just in time for Christmas, Polk Sheriff Grady Judd's prostitution sting results in 61 arrests.
Sheriff Grady Judd will hold a press conference today to announce the results of the latest Polk Prostitution sting from last week. The sting was part of a undercover operation targeting individuals who respond to online advertisements on Backpage.com. The online ads are usually listings for escort or massage services, but once the person responds to the hotel, the undercover deputies try to make an arrest for an illegal activity. These undercover officers can be very aggressive and often do most of the talking. The sheriff was also targeting human trafficking which is a much more serious felony offense. There are some harsh […]
- Medical marijuana amendment fails in Florida, pot still illegal to possess. What defenses do you have to a possession of cannabis case?
Florida’s medical marijuana amendment did not pass yesterday in the election. Even though a majority of the voters voted in favor of passing the medical marijuana amendment, receiving 58% of the vote, it fell 2% shy needed to pass. In 2006, Florida voters decided all constitutional amendments needed a “super majority” to pass (60% instead of 50%). Ironically, that amendment that now requires a super majority, only passed with 57.8% of the vote. Whether or not the issue is placed back on the ballot is unknown at this time. John Morgan of Morgan & Morgan who spearheaded the campaign had previously […]