Jefferson County Award to Railroad Worker May Set Record
Mar 14, 2014
St. Peters, MO (Law Firm Newswire) March 14, 2014 – A Missouri conductor lost his leg when he was struck by a BNSF Railway train. Now, his resulting court award may the largest on record in Jefferson County.
One never hears about the majority of workplace injuries, and most are settled quietly and equitably. But some cases depart from routine, drawing major media attention. Recently, a Jefferson County jury awarded what may be the largest personal injury verdict in county history.
The case reached court on January 21, 2014, centering on a railroad worker whose right leg was amputated after it was run over by a train. The jury took about two hours to deliberate before delivering a unanimous verdict and awarding $12.5 million to Michael Bolen, 51, of Jackson, Missouri. Bolen, formerly a conductor/switchman for BNSF Railway, said that he stumbled over a boulder in an area adjacent to the tracks and was unable to avoid a slow-moving train that struck him.
According to Bolen’s attorney, the railroad attempted to settle the case for $400,000 before the trial. At trial, Bolen’s attorney sought minimum damages of $10.5 million. The plaintiff argued that railroad negligence contributed to the accident and demonstrated that unsafe working conditions existed when Bolen, an ex-Marine, was injured.
At trial, BNSF argued that Bolen was lying about the circumstances of the accident and the sequence of events. The company hired engineers to disprove Bolen’s story through mechanical calculations and computer animations; they claimed that the accident was not physically possible as the plaintiff described it. The company also tried to dilute Bolen’s claim for lost wages, calling a witness who stated that Bolen could get a better job than the car wash employment he said he could now sustain.
“Employers will assemble an array of experts to impress a jury with their technical expertise in an attempt to convince them that a plaintiff must be wrong,” said Charles James, a prominent Missouri work injury attorney. “The ultimate objective is to tamp down or even eliminate damages.”
But the jury did not agree with the defense’s assessment, and the $12.5 million award will help Bolen to recover from his losses.
Learn more at http://www.jameslawgroup.net/.
James Law Group, LLC
14 Richmond Center Court
St. Peters, MO 63376
Toll Free: 800.229.7112
- State Settles with Insurance Firms over Workers’ Compensation Irregularities
An insurance business truism: insurance companies love to collect money, but they detest parting with it. And a prominent January settlement between the Missouri Department of Insurance and two insurance companies certainly backed up the truth behind the stereotype. State insurance regulators settled with EMCASCO Insurance Company and Employers Mutual Casualty Company after examiners found […]
- Missouri Marijuana Legalization Could Save Millions and Reduce Incarceration State-Wide
Mere talk of medical marijuana legalization has some Missouri lawmakers scurrying; the state government is now preemptively passing resolutions to record the position of opposing local governments. While medical or recreational legalization of the drug in the Show Me State may remain unlikely for the present moment, it is far more certain that legalized marijuana […]
- As Missouri Case Shows, Stand Your Ground May Not Prove Relevant Defense
So-called “stand your ground” laws have received much national attention, especially after one such law was invoked in George Zimmerman’s successful defense (State of Florida v. Zimmerman) relating to Trayvon Martin’s death in February 2012. But at least one case in Missouri has demonstrated that killings can be deemed justified on broader, more complex grounds […]
- Huge “Guinea Pig Worker” Award Telling Example of Workers’ Compensation Exceptions in Missouri
Traditionally, workplace injuries in Missouri have been channeled through the state’s workers’ compensation system. But the state legislature amended the law several years ago to exempt injuries that develop over a period of time. Because of that reform, one such case culminated in a $28 million award this November. As a result of the amended […]
- Should I Consent To Take Or Refuse To Take The Breath/Blood Test? Part 4
The Prior Offender A prior offender is a driver who at the time of his stop and detention as a DWI suspect has previously entered a plea of guilty to or been convicted after trial of an alcohol/drug related driving offense. For this person, whether to consent or to refuse chemical testing of his blood […]