Florida’s Amendment Three Not Without Shortcomings Says SSI Attorney David Magann

Tampa, FL (Law Firm Newswire) August 8, 2017 – In 2016, voters in Florida helped pass Amendment Three, a 100 percent property tax exemption to first responders who suffered a permanent disability while on duty.

The tax Exemption for Permanently and Totally Disabled First Responders Amendment applies to police, fire, jail and EMS workers who are completely and permanently disabled due to an injury suffered in the line of duty. However, there are some first responders who have encountered challenges that have adversely affected their eligibility.

One such person is April Bulla, a disabled former medic. Bulla said eight years ago, while she was administering treatment to a patient, the ambulance she was in became involved in a collision. She stated that her head crashed into a cabinet, and caused her to suffer brain damage. She is in possession of medical records that mention the injury and her disability.

Florida social security disability attorney David W. Magann states “Because of the additional requirement of Amendment Three, some first responders may not realize the benefit the amendment was intended to provide.”

Bulla can be in the midst of making plans to go someplace, and then forget where she is going. Or she could be at home and be unaware of what she is doing. She has difficulty with numbers and with reading. She also becomes easily flustered, and grapples with short-term memory loss. Her doctor said she is unable to keep a job, and in need of assistance.

She receives approximately $800 monthly in Social Security disability, which covers the cost of her living expenses associated with her home in Citrus County, along with her prescriptions. Her only other source of income is from the sale of her chickens. Bulla believed that Amendment Three would help her survive. However, Florida legislators crafted rules that make it much more difficult for her to benefit from the tax break.

According to the lawmakers’ plan, medical records and proof of disability are not the only requirements. She also has to provide a note from her previous employer that links her disability with her former position. But any company for which legal exposure is a concern may be unwilling to do so.

Learn more at http://www.floridasocialsecurity.com/

David W. Magann, P.A.
Main Office:
156 W. Robertson St.
Brandon, FL 33511
Call: (813) 657-9175

Tampa Office:
4012 Gunn Highway #165
Tampa, Florida 33618

View Larger Map

  • NEW IMPAIRMENT LISTING IN FULL EFFECT & APPLICABLE TO ALL ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS IMMEDIATELY
    NEW MENTAL LISTINGS Effective: January 17, 2017 After a revision of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM), and thousands of public comments later, the Social Security Administration (SSA) has published significant revisions to its mental impairment listings.  SSA had issued a Notice of Proposed Rule Making in August 2010, proposing what at the time appeared to be […]
  • SSA is Heading For Delays Again After Recent Cutbacks & Years of Improvement
    Service Cuts, Computer Problems Cloud Social Security’s 79th Birthday: The Social Security Administration should have reason to celebrate. After all, August 14, 2014, marked the 79th anniversary of the day when President Franklin Roosevelt signed the Social Security Act, which ushered in the landmark entitlement program. However, the agency’s birthday was a less than cheerful […]
  • SSA is Ramping Up Disability Reviews in 2014
    The Social Security Disability Benefits Reform Act of 1984 (“DBRA 1984”) was passed by a unanimous, bipartisan vote in the House and Senate (99-0) in September 1984. President Reagan signed the law on October 9, 1984, when it became Pub. L. No. 98-460. One of the main provisions required “medical improvement” before benefits could be terminated where […]
  • Never Allow A Non-Attorney to Represent You At Your Social Security Hearing!
    You should NOT have a non-attorney clerk at your hearing?  This seems obvious, but several Florida law firms and any company identifying themselves as “Experts”, some who are advertising on TV, are sending non-attorney clerks to Social Security Hearings simply because its cheaper for them to do so rather than have an actual attorney appear. How in […]
  • Do Not Believe Non-Lawyer Websites Who Post 95% Success Rates!
    Continually we see claimants who have had a non-lawyer representative whose company boasts a 95% success rate when in fact it is simply not true. No lawyer website can ethically advertise with success rates in percentages because it is misleading and yes, unethical. Each claim is different and if it is to good to be true, […]