Giflix and La Poll Attorney Urges Prospective Parents to Create an Estate Plan if Using Assisted Reproductive Technology

Palo Alto, CA (Law Firm Newswire) September 26, 2014 – Prospective parents using Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) should use estate planning as a tool to legally protect both the future of their unborn children and their own genetic material.

“Although it may seem like an uncomfortable discussion, it can actually be a simple one,” remarked Michael Gilfix, an estate planning attorney. “A good estate planning attorney can lay out the legal questions surrounding ART, and he or she can help draft solid legal protections for all involved.”

The use and disposition of stored genetic material will need to be considered from a legal perspective. If one of the partners dies or becomes incapacitated, it can be unclear who takes charge of the stored material and whether it can be used. A straightforward legal document covering this issue can help avoid challenges from other family members.

Other questions surround the legal parentage and inheritance status of any child that is posthumously conceived. For example, if a parent has not created a specific provision in a will or estate plan, a posthumously conceived child must meet strict California requirements in order to be given the rights of an heir. The use of an estate plan can help ensure that current and future children are provided for according to their parents’ wishes.

Estate planning can also give rise to other opportunities to plan for a future child. As the American Fertility Association has pointed out, a prospective parent may use his or her estate plan to indicate how and when a family member or friend should talk to the child about how he or she was conceived.

Gilfix points out that although many couples may have discussed some of this information with a doctor, information indicated in a medical setting may not hold up to legal challenges. He encourages all prospective parents using ART to sit down with a lawyer to, at the very least, discuss the issues at hand.

Gilfix & La Poll Associates LLP
2300 Geng Rd., Suite 200
Palo Alto, CA 94303
Telephone: (650) 493-8070
http://www.gilfix.com/

Facebook: Like Us!

  • Talking to Dad about his driving: the surprising side of difficult conversations
    Do you think it will be tough to ask Dad to hand over the keys?  Surprisingly, a recent study from Liberty Mutual showed that 84 percent of seniors are open to talking about the safety of their driving, but that only six percent have actually had the discussion. As Liberty Mutual put it, “Seniors are […]
  • Setting up a special needs trust: three reasons to start sooner
    When preparing for the future of a child or family member with a disability, many parents and guardians plan to set up a special needs trust.  This unique kind of trust can provide for many of the supplemental needs of a disabled person without jeopardizing that person’s eligibility for vital government benefits, including Medi-Cal and […]
  • Michael Gilfix discusses Medi-Cal asset seizure in Mercury News
    A growing number of older Californians are concerned about Medi-Cal asset seizure, according to a new article from the San Jose Mercury News. The California State Assembly recently passed a new bill designed to limit Medi-Cal’s ability to recover assets from the estates of deceased Medi-Cal beneficiaries. As the law stands currently, Medi-Cal can seize […]
  • Long-Term Care Insurance: Options Abound, As Do Complications
    Long-term care insurance has become a critical topic as health care costs continue to rise.  The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services estimates the average annual cost of U.S. nursing home care to be $74,820. But in California, the Department of Health Care Services estimates that cost to be $91,250.  Recently, public debate about […]
  • Gilfix discusses Medi-Cal planning in the San Francisco Chronicle
    In the August 24, 2014 issue of the San Francisco Chronicle, reporter Kathleen Pender wrote about Medi-Cal reimbursement or “estate claims” that are imposed on a person’s estate if they receive Medi-Cal and after they pass. The article makes the point that the state could seek “an unlimited amount” from an individual’s estate when “Medi-Cal […]