Brooks Acordia Patent Attorney Looks Forward to U.S. Adoption of Hague Agreement

Los Angeles, CA (Law Firm Newswire) June 17, 2014 — After more than 13 years of efforts from lawmakers and patent officials, the United States is on the verge of becoming a member nation of the Hague Agreement.

The Hague Agreement Concerning the International Deposit of Industrial Designs, also known as the “Hague system,” allows for the registration of industrial designs in all participating nations with a single application and a single set of fees. Los Angeles patent attorney Pejman Yedidsion said he looked forward to the change.

“The Hague Agreement has been working very well in its member nations for quite a while,” Yedidsion noted, “and I know that many U.S. inventors and patent attorneys are eager to participate as well. They will soon be able to dramatically reduce the repetitive work of registering industrial designs in multiple jurisdictions.”

The United States was one of the original signatories to the Geneva Act for the Hague Agreement in 1999. However, the U.S. Senate did not ratify the treaty until 2007, and the bill to implement the treaty was not made law until December 2012. That law is expected to take effect soon.

Under the Hague Agreement, applications for registration of industrial designs are filed directly with the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Applications may be written in English, French or Spanish. A single application may include up to 100 different designs as long as they all fall under the same class of the International Classification of Industrial Designs.

In order to qualify to use the Hague system, the applicant must be associated with a member nation by nationality, domicile, habitual residence, or a real and effective industrial or commercial establishment.

“First, WIPO’s International Bureau examines the application to make sure it meets the formal requirements,” Yedidsion explained. “Then, intellectual property offices in the member nations evaluate the design to make sure it meets their domestic criteria for registration. If it does not, they notify WIPO of their refusal. The international registration then goes into effect in all nations that do not issue a refusal, and the design receives the same protection as it would if registered separately in each jurisdiction.”

The initial duration of the international registration is five years, and it may be extended in five-year increments up to the maximum duration permitted in each jurisdiction.

Learn more at http://www.brooksacordia.com/

Brooks Acordia IP Law, P.C.
1445 E. Los Angeles Ave. #108
Simi Valley, CA 93065-2827
Phone: (805) 579-2500
Fax: (805) 584-6427

Twitter

Facebook

Google+

  • Brooks Acordia Patent Attorney Anticipates Narrow Ruling in Patentability of Computer Implemented Methods
    On March 31, 2014 The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the case of Alice Corporation Pty. Ltd. v. CLS Bank Int’l.<br />
    The issue before the Court is whether and when patents on software, or computer-implemented inventions, are patentable subject matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101.<br />
    “The Supreme Court has interpreted section 101 to prohibit patents on abstract ideas,” said Los Angeles patent attorney Pejman “PJ” Yedidsion. “The focus on this case is whether Alice’s patent in fact covers an …
  • How the America Invents Act weakens the grace period for disclosure of inventions
    It is crucial for inventors to understand what constitutes prior art in the post-America Invents Act (AIA) era. <br />
    Under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1), public disclosures are prior art — and therefore preclude the patentability of an invention. Public disclosures include patents, descriptions in printed publications, public use, availability for sale or other availability to the public.<br />
    Prior to the AIA, only domestic disclosures were considered prior art. That geographic limitation no longer exists. The phrase “otherwise available to the public” …
  • Google Books case illustrates the four factors of fair use
    In November 2013, U.S. Circuit Judge Denny Chin hastened the end of years of legal wrangling over the legality of Google’s scanning and indexing of copyrighted works for its Google Books project. In Authors Guild, Inc. v. Google Inc., SDNY, No. 05 Civ. 8136 (DC), Judge Chin ruled that Google’s work amounted to “fair use” of the books.<br />
    “Fair use” is an exception to a copyright holder’s exclusive right to the use of a protected work. The United States Code …