Tampa, FL (Law Firm Newswire) May 15, 2014 — Lawmakers are desperate to put a dent in the national deficit.
On Capitol Hill, both Democrats and Republicans are searching for potential areas to cut spending or increase revenue. One such idea has Social Security disability advocates particularly uneasy.
Under the proposal, those who collect unemployment benefits would become ineligible for disability payments.
While the federal budget deficit has narrowed a bit this February (compared to the same month last year), it still stands at $193.5 billion. The suggestion to eliminate disability payments to those who collect unemployment benefits appeared in President Obama’s latest proposed budget.
“The impetus to find creative ways to cut spending and reduce the federal deficit gained momentum with the onset of the federal sequester,” said David Magann, a prominent Social Security disability attorney in Tampa, Florida. “However, this idea unfairly targets those who already face a tough task finding employment due to their disabilities. And that fact has been compounded by a less-than-robust economy.”
Lawmakers estimate that the proposal would save $3.2 billion over 10 years. As the law stands now, disabled beneficiaries, whose average monthly benefit was about $1,130 per month in 2013, are allowed to earn up to an additional $1,070 per month in wages. The average unemployment benefit is $1,200.
Theoretically, the reform would prevent people from collecting both benefits during the same time frame. Supporters argue that the two benefits are opposite sides of the same coin, and receipt of one should disqualify eligibility for the other. Some have dubbed the practice of collecting both payments “double-dipping.”
However, the proposal has also faced blowback from a number of groups, so it remains to be seen if it will survive.
“It uniquely burdens the disabled among all workers, and it sets a terrible precedent of raiding Social Security to pay for other social programs,” wrote a coalition of disabled advocacy groups in a letter to Senator Tom Harkin, D-Iowa, chairman of the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions.
Learn more at http://www.floridasocialsecurity.com/
David W. Magann, P.A.
156 W. Robertson St.
Brandon, FL 33511
Call: (813) 657-9175
6107 Memorial Hwy
Tampa, Florida 33615
- Never Allow A Non-Attorney to Represent You At Your Social Security Hearing!
You should NOT have a non-attorney clerk at your hearing? This seems obvious, but several Florida law firms and any company identifying themselves as “Experts”, some who are advertising on TV, are sending non-attorney clerks to Social Security Hearings simply because its cheaper for them to do so rather than have an actual attorney appear. How in […]
- Do Not Believe Non-Lawyer Websites Who Post 95% Success Rates!
Continually we see claimants who have had a non-lawyer representative whose company boasts a 95% success rate when in fact it is simply not true. No lawyer website can ethically advertise with success rates in percentages because it is misleading and yes, unethical. Each claim is different and if it is to good to be true, […]
- Missing Your Social Security Statements? SSA’s New Policy
SSA has recently changed its policy regarding the availability of the annual Social Security Statement. Effective May 1, 2012, SSA will begin to provide real-time online access to the Statement with the release of the new “MySocialSecurity” portal, www.socialsecurity.gov/mystatement. In March 2011, due to budget issues, SSA suspended the mailing of all annual Social […]
- Self Employed Work: if you have a Social Security Disability claim, beware!
Those engaging in self employed work while having an ongoing Social Security Disability claim have a greater burden of proving the work is not substantial, gainful actvity (SGA). In general, if a worker in the year 2012 makes $1010.00 (non-blind worker)(blind worker SGA $1690.00) or greater SGA will be assumed unless otherwise proven. See, SSR 83-24, 20 […]
- Social Security Funding is Easily Fixable
The outrage over Social Security benefits viability is warranted. It is clear the program faces long-run financing issues since 1983 and it was well understood by Congress that the shortfall was not going be corrected since early in 1993. ”The Figure shows that the deficit has hovered around 2 percent of taxable payrolls for almost 20 years.” Since nothing has been […]